Thaler takes aim at Justic Scalia's "broccoli" comment during the recent oral arguments before the Court over Obamacare. He ends this way:
More generally, we would be better off as a society if we could collectively agree to ignore all slippery-slope arguments that aren’t accompanied by evidence that said slope exists. If you are opposed to a policy, state your case based on the merits — not on the imagined risk of what else might happen down the road. The path of that road is so unpredictable that it may even produce a U-turn.But on the other side of the discussion, look at Robert Levy and William Mellor's The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom. This is from their conclusion:
Over the past seven decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has rewritted major parts of our Constitution, including the General Welfare Clause, Commerce Clause, Contracts Clause, Non-Delegation Doctrine, and the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.Constitional law is not my field, but the authors' case-by-case analysis of the "Dirty Dozen" is eye-opening. I even wish that there had been more attention to slippery slopes over the past seven decades.